City of Monona
Significant changes to the 2010 Budget:
Property Tax levy increase $112,120 or 2.34%
Unused amount $34,500
Mill Rate 5.18 per thousand
Impact on average house ($29.00 decrease)
***
General Fund – Revenues
Increases
$5,000 increase in taxes from the water utility
$41,600 increase in transportation aid
$3,341 increase in expenditure restraint program
$48,000 increase for rent of city property
Total increases $97,941
Decreases
$10,000 decrease in Room Tax
$27,600 decrease in shared revenues
$17,000 decrease for COPS grant
$2,000 decrease in liquor licenses
$135,000 decrease in interest income
$150,000 in applied fund balance
Total decreases $341,600
***
General Fund – Expenditures
· Legislative – cut professional development
· Judicial – No changes
· Legal – no changes
· Executive – Minor changes for salary allocation of clerk
· Finance – Minor changes- Audit contract will be out for bids for 2010.(unknown)
· Clerk – cut Prof development, publications, & public notices
· Personnel
Increase for retiree health insurance $24,000(sick leave)
· Election, IT, Insurance & Inspections– No change
· Assessment- Will bid out for assessors, with no walkthroughs
· General Building – Minor changes
· Law Enforcement
Cut OT by $20,000
Cut fuel by $18,000
· Fire – Cut all other non-personnel cost by $6,000 or 12%.
· Dispatch –
Eliminate the 5th dispatcher (Currently vacant)
Change from New World software to Global software.
· Public Works
$2,000 decrease in Mechanic supplies
$12,000 decrease in fuel
$3,000 cut in part-time workers in parks
Cut Gazebo Maint. Cut portable restrooms, Lake weed spraying
$7,000 cut to tree removal
$2,500 saving on gypsy moth spray program
· Planning – Cut intern hours/pay ($4,000)
All other Funds
CDA – Cut Marketing $10,000
Cable TV had no significant changes – uses $11,000 in fund balance
Library Fund
· $19,000 in applied fund Balance
· $26,000 increase library Aid Revenue
· Increase in part-time wages by $11,000
· Health Ins decrease of $8,000 from 2009 Budget
· Gas & Electric decreased by $6,000
· The levy increase was zero, but total expenses increased $23,000
Community Center
· Increase in property taxes by $16,000
· Decreased revenues by $8,750.
· Expenses increased by $7,000 or 4%.
Recreation
Increase program revenues by $10,000
Increased fees for Youth Baseball (increase revenue by $3,000)
decrease levy by 3%
Increase Part-time wages
Decreased amount to the youth center from $6,000 to $3,000
Expenditure increase by 12%.
Senior Center –
Increase in property taxes by $14,000.
Expenditure increased by 7%
Non-personnel cost decreased by 5%.
Pool – No Changes
Ambulance
$20,000 increase for revenues, proposed rate increase.
$2,000 of applied fund balance.
Debt Service
$120,000 of applied fund balance
Solid Waste – levy increased by $7,000 per contract with Green Valley
Stormwater – No rate increase
Water
The water utility will need a rate increase in 2010.
Sewer
Rate increase done in 2009.
Transit
Levy increased by $2,000. Per Contract
The levy is going up, but the average tax bill is going down? Did I understand correctly? Is this because of the decrease in property values?
ReplyDeleteAlso, assessors won't be coming in homes every 3 years? This always seemed excessive. What will the new procedure be?
Carl, you are partly correct. The value of the 'average' house went down by $4,000. And that drop partly offsets the proposed levy increase.
ReplyDelete(BTW, I think this should really be 'median' rather than 'average'.)
However, the TOTAL assessed value of property in Monona went UP. (My guess is that is because of the value of new buildings that first went on the rolls on Jan. 1, 2009.)
So even though many people experienced a drop in assessed home value, the MILL rate also will go DOWN - an unusual combination.
(Mill rate: The tax per dollar of assessed value of property. The rate is expressed in "mills", where one mill is one-tenth of a cent ($0.001).)
Not sure on the assessors yet. The proposal is to not have walk-throughs in the next assessor contract. (They were every 4 years under the current contract that expires this year.).
ReplyDeleteThe city can save some money on the assessor contract, but the property rolls will become less accurate over time. We can probably take a pass on walk-throughs for a few years.