Sunday, March 08, 2009

Alder Speight on Pedestrian Safety

A guest blog post from Alder Chad Speight on pedestrian safety:

I wanted to address the issue of sidewalks, and more broadly, the need to make our streets safer and more inviting to pedestrians.

Monona is a great community in many ways, but Monona is not a pedestrian-friendly community. The simple fact is that the school district is required to provide busing to many students, at great expense to taxpayers, who would otherwise be able to walk to school if our streets were accommodating to pedestrians.

While it IS possible to walk in the street, or to walk through yards on the public right of way, fewer people walk due to the lack of sidewalks and other design features that would make walking safer. So safer streets would allow us to spend less money busing children.

I have often heard comments from parents that Monona needs more sidewalks, and safer streets. While I allow my children to walk or bike around town on clear, sunny days, I always insist on driving them around town when visibility is poor, since I know they will be in the street. And adults make similar decisions.

The result of driving rather than walking has many ill-effects. We waste money on gas, add more wear and tear on our vehicles and roads; and we are less healthy. Not to mention the negative environmental impact of more pollution.

The Safe Routes To School (SRTS) program was started in 2005 to assist communities like Monona, providing valuable grant funding to help improve pedestrian infrastructure like cross-walks and sidewalks. SRTS was established by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bush for all of the reasons stated above, that walking is better for us that driving, particularly for school children. Monona needs to develop a long-range plan to improve our pedestrian infrastructure, and SRTS is a great program that will help pay for any improvements we make.

I proposed the Friendly Streets Ordinance last summer to initiate discussion in our community about such improvements. We have been discussing improvements at Public Safety and Public Works for the last 4 months. I do NOT believe that Monona needs sidewalks on every street, but I do believe that main thoroughfares, which I identified in my original ordinance, need sidewalks or significant improvements which make pedestrian travel safer.

I believe that the lack of safe streets contributes to the lack of families with young children moving into our community, and I presented my ideas to the Family Attraction Committee last month. Some people argue that Monona will lose it's special character if we add any sidewalks, but I think Dean and Nichols Road are just as much a part of Monona as any other street, and both streets already have sidewalks.

I am not willing to wait for a child or anyone else to be hit by a car to decide that this is a priority. I realize that a very vocal group of sidewalk opponents exist in Monona, but I am willing to speak up for the many people who happen to disagree, but who have been afraid to speak up.

I believe that we need to avoid or reduce cutting down trees, by allowing any new sidewalks to meander around mature trees whenever possible. We will need to evaluate all options carefully. I also have proposed adding sidewalks only on one side of the street, to reduce costs. If we can obtain full grant funding, then no property tax assessments would be required. If only partial funding is obtained, then I would support adding the costs of these improvements into the capital budget, to avoid any special assessments, in recognition that these select new paths are for the benefit of ALL citizens. Since most citizens will never have a sidewalk, the few that might get one should not be assessed for costs that exceed any grant funding. The exception would be my own front yard, which needs a sidewalk, and I would gladly pay that assessment.

I want Monona to retain our great community spirit, and I believe that adding a few sidewalks on main residential thoroughfares will help us continue to thrive and prosper, as a great place to raise a family, or simply a great place to live for people of all ages.

A positive next step would be the formation of a SRTS Task force to create a priority list of improvements that would make our streets safer, and allow the district to reduce busing costs. The SRTS program guide suggests that such a task force be comprised of elected leaders, school administrators, parents, and other concerned citizens.

I hope that we can have a healthy dialogue which leads to real improvements in our great city. Please contact me if you are interested in serving on a task force to address this vital public issue.

Sincerely,

Alderman Chad Speight

13 comments:

  1. Dear Chad S-P-E-I-G-H-T,

    (Doug told me to spell it that way.)

    I 2 do NOT want to wait unitl there is an accident. Has Public Safety asked for this OR has our PD said it is unsafe OR is this your personnel thought or idea?

    I did some checking and the cost is $70 a running foot not a yard and if you meander around my trees it goes up even more.

    I still think that we are headed for a major increase from our schools or city after Doyle's budget.

    I disagree-we have not marked all the major throughfares that are marked int the PW report for peds.

    Timing is everything and now is not the time....unless the feds agree to pay for it and maintain msy new sidewalk that I asked for ...ha ha.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good job on the spelling of Chad's name. Not to make a big deal of it, but really basic respect for others should dictate that we spell one another's name correctly.

    "Has Public Safety asked for this OR has our PD said it is unsafe OR is this your personnel [sic] thought or idea?"

    Aren't alders supposed to have thoughts and ideas?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Aren't alders supposed to have thoughts and ideas?"

    Yes, but only ideas that I agree with...you may have a point.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have we looked at a shared streets concept instead of retro-fitting the city w sidewalks?

    HP

    ReplyDelete
  5. Developing a pedestrian safety plan - and that is really a more appropriate way to think about it - is still a work in progress. Let's give it some time to develop.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am open to any and all changes to make Monona a more pedestrian-friendly community. The original ordinance which I developed calls for "sidewalks or virtual sidewalks." My "ordinance" was really an invitation for us to discuss this as a community. I note that sidewalks would be great, but that our community has often been resistant to sidewalks, so other options might be considered.

    We ask too much of our roads, which are supposed to accommodate two-way driving, parking, biking, and walking. For this reason, most urban residential streets have sidewalks in other communities.

    In lieu of sidewalks, I suggest that we could limit parking and create marked walking paths along the street. OF course, we all know that you walk against the traffic when walking in the street. So we might consider marking BOTH sides of the street if we do things this way. Also, parked cars are a hazard for pedestrians, especially once you add bicyclists in the roads as well.

    Another option would be to lower the speed limit to 20MPH everywhere, or post a city-wide 15mph limit when pedestrians are present.

    We could do nothing (the easy option) arguing that no one who enjoys walking would move to Monona. Maybe almost all citizens prefer to pay for busing or drive their children to school.

    The cost of sidewalks could be as low as $20/foot ($4 /square foot), but if retaining walls are required, and if driveway aprons are rebuilt and regraded, then considerable extra costs can add up.

    But let's be clear about the reality of this issue. Monona will change either way. A growing number of people, with and without children, expect sidewalks in an urban community.

    If we ignore this reality, fewer people will move to Monona, particularly families. Property values will not keep up with other communities. We are already seeing a precipitous drop in school-age children, and we are likely to see an elementary school get closed due to declining enrollment. Many parents who do live here are not happy with the situation, and feel that kids are not wanted in Monona.

    If we make major changes to improve pedestrian safety(with or without sidewalks), then many current residents will be upset with the inconvenience of less parking, or snow shoveling, etc. I have heard people say that people who advocate for sidewalks want to push out our older citizens.

    I reject these accusations. The simple fact is that fewer people in Monona walk BECAUSE WE LACK SAFE WAYS TO DO SO.

    I just want to see Monona prosper and adapt so that we maintain our vitality for people of all ages. I believe that doing nothing will not serve our long interests. But maybe I am crazy? I do not think so. In the end, some streets are too busy to lack sidewalks. Many other streets could get by with something less than sidewalks, but I do think that we need to make some changes so that walking is safer and encouraged.

    We will all be healthier and wealthier if we are more comfortable leaving our cars parked at home. Those who want to keep driving will be free to do so, but we all need to share the road.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Too bad this all came up after major reconstruction of Midmoor.
    How come there was never any discussion of that roadway design, particularly since it is the designated bike path? The residents were not notified by the city that it was going to be rebuilt until after the design was completed - no real chance for public input on that road design. This is especially curious given the the hoopla that occurred over the Winnequah Rd reconstruction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have lived in Monona since 1963 and raised three children here. I do not feel the need to have sidewalks installed beyond what we currently have. We do need to continue to upgrade our streets though.
    paf

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Too bad this all came up after major reconstruction of Midmoor."

    Good point. I wasn't on Public Works for Midmoor, but failed to raise any questions about it at the council. The design was done before Chad was on the council.

    Maybe the fact that the council burned its fingers on Winnequah explains a hesitance to get involved.

    And sidewalks have long been the third rail of Monona politics (or one of them anyway!).

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Maybe the fact that the council burned its fingers on Winnequah explains a hesitance to get involved."

    I think this statement is accurate, and people in general
    need to learn from it.

    One purpose of governnment is to find compromises, so many more people in total can enjoy anything. It seems both nationally and locally, people only want 100% and anything less is a failure.

    The complaining about mistakes, as well as spreading of rumors and name calling, ends up making the process more closed, and reduces compromises. Fewer people get input, projects are less sucessfull, and the spiral continues.

    ReplyDelete
  11. a citywide 15 mph strict limit should be enacted in conjunction with Monona Dr reconstruction start(if it really ever happens). I think during construction, double fines are in order. We will be a short-cut for thousands. After construction we would have better input for plotting a course. Were talking a few minutes of RESIDENTIAL drive time. at the most.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 15 mph?? Please. First of all, it's hard enough getting people to drive that slowly for a few hundred feet by a school. You are not going to get compliance.

    Second, it is unnnecssary for safety. 25 mph is a prefectly reasonable speed. Did you know that Wisconsin's 25 mph residnetial speed limit is lower than the typical 30 mph nationwide?

    Traffic is going to flow through during the project. We will need to heighten traffic enforcement, but don't expect to make a serious dent in the amount of traffic diverting through the city.

    I've been working in traffic safety for over 20 years and traffic is a lot like flowing water; it will find a path. Some of it will use Stoughton Road and some of it will stay on Monona Drive and some of it will divert through Monona and other routes.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The fines are too small. Let the speeders pay. Were talking residential with no sidewalks. Do you live on a dead end street?

    ReplyDelete