Friday, November 19, 2010

MG Charter School Meeting this Sunday

Passing along a press release I received:


Monona Grove

Charter Middle School

Update Meeting

Sunday, November 21, 2010

6:30 pm

Monona Public Library

Community Media Room

A group of parents, educators, and professionals has been meeting to discuss the formation of a charter middle school in the Monona Grove School District.

The general public is invited to their next meeting for an update on the progress they’ve made and their plans for the future.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Mayor Kahl Offers MG a Plan

November 17, 2010


Mr. Craig Gerlach

Superintendant

Monona Grove School District

5301 Monona Drive

Monona, WI 53716

Mrs. Susan Fox

President

Monona Grove School Board

5301 Monona Drive

Monona, WI 53716

Dear Craig and Susan,

As the Monona Grove School District is reviewing its facility needs for next year and beyond, I would like to offer a concept I feel could provide a balanced solution that can benefit both the District and the City of Monona.

The City’s current Senior Center is located in the lower level of the Community Center. Due to the annual increases in the number of individuals utilizing this facility, we have a significant need for more space. Frankly, this has been a need brewing for a few years now, and we need to make some decisions. As such, I ask you to consider a joint facilities plan that would involve relocation of the Senior Center into the Maywood School building. Specifically, I propose the following:

NICHOLS:

It is my understanding that the Nichols complex is currently about half-occupied with uses including the District offices and the Monona Grove Liberal Arts Charter School for the 21st Century (MG21). I also understand the District has discussed the long-range possibility of moving one or more of these uses to Maywood. I would propose that the movement of District offices to Maywood take place now. As you know, the City has been approached with multiple potential development concepts for the Nichols site and I am confident that any of these potential uses would garner the district income substantially in excess of the recent appraised value of this property. As you also know, nothing can happen to further discussions of these and other unknown potential development options until the District indicates it is ready to seriously consider the possibility of redevelopment of this property. Vacating Nichols would send such an indication that the District is at least willing to open the doors to a discussion on this facility’s future while not obligating the

District to make any final determinations regarding sale or redevelopment. Additionally, I understand that keeping the offices at Nichols would require the District to make improvements to the facility, involving capital costs. It therefore may make better sense to instead put that money into moving the District offices to Maywood now versus spending some money for remodeling at Nichols when the future use of that facility is in question.

MAYWOOD:

Even with a move of the District offices to Maywood, there would still be more than enough space for the Monona Senior Center to also be located within Maywood. Additionally, I would ask you to consider allowing early childhood and 4K students to continue attending Maywood. I make this latter request because this combination would present unique intergenerational learning opportunities for our seniors and very young students, afford the District a great volunteer base of seniors ready and willing to contribute their talents to meet the needs of our very young students, and leave room at Winnequah to meet the anticipated space needs of the charter middle school. I also understand that retaining 4k and early childhood at Maywood would still achieve staff savings related to IMC, food services and administration that are motivating the District’s contemplated facility changes. In such a scenario, I would propose that the City make a financial contribution toward some of the District’s general capital improvement costs at Maywood (e.g. central air conditioning), as some of these would also be necessary for our Senior Center and yet present the City with a cost savings when compared to the investment a newly constructed Senior Center facility would require. In addition, I presume the costs specifically related to redevelopment of the Senior Center space would be borne by the City and trust that the kitchen and cafeteria/gym space would be available for use by the Senior Center.

COMMUNITY CENTER:

With the Senior Center at Maywood, MG21 could be moved to the lower level of the Community Center which currently houses the Senior Center. This location has multiple spaces including a kitchen, computer lab, offices, restrooms and dividable meeting rooms. It is my understanding that the District would not need these spaces during the summer months when our pool is in operation and we would therefore seek to utilize at least part of that space for pool-related rental parties if determined by the City that such a use would be viable.

WINNEQUAH:

To make room for the new uses at Maywood discussed above, I am assuming that kindergarten, first and second grades would be moved to Winnequah. This K-5 grade configuration would hopefully achieve the staff cost savings you need and also leave room for the charter middle school currently under development to be located in the lower level of Winnequah. The charter middle school is progressing on a track that would have the first group of sixth graders attending in the fall of 2012, and locating that school at Winnequah would utilize the recently remodeled science labs, occupy other remaining available space in that facility and provide access to other natural science learning environments given its proximity to Lake Monona, Winnequah Park and the Aldo Leopold Nature Center.

I want to reiterate that this conceptual partnership is one that is subject to approval by the city council and other city boards, and we therefore have a few steps to take in the coming weeks to effectuate these changes if this is a discussion the District is interested in pursuing. I hope you concur that this plan provides the

Page 2 of 3

benefit of meeting our collective space needs in a cost-effective manner. I trust you will also find that implementation of this plan affords you the opportunity for an open discussion on the future of Nichols School now versus in staggered, drawn-out phases of decision-making that lacks the finality on this topic that residents of Monona and Cottage Grove desire.

Respectfully,

Robb B. Kahl

Mayor

City of Monona

cc: Monona Grove School Board

Monona City Council

Page

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Monona Alt School Open House - December 2

The Monona Grove Liberal Arts Charter School for 21st Century Skills or MG 21 for short, the new charter school located in Monona, will host an open house Thursday, December 2 from 6:30-8 p.m. at the Nichols School Building. All are welcome.


[Beware the subliminal messages.]

[Cookies.]
MG 21 -- the Monona Grove Liberal Arts Charter School for 21st Century Skills -- opened this past fall in the former library and related classroom space at Nichols School. The school, chartered by the Monona Grove school district and the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, provides a project-based learning environment for students in grades 10-12. The school also incorporates skills outlined in the Partnership for 21st Century Skills as critical for student success in the coming years. The school recently received a major state charter school grant to help implement its programs and curriculum.

[Cookies.]

All are welcome to attend; parents and students interested in attending MG21 are especially encouraged to attend. MG21 teaching staff and students will be at the open house, and a brief presentation on the school will included. Cookies and punch will be served.

[Cookies.]
Entrance to MG21 are the doors immediately east of the Nichols School parking lot, and just south of the entrance to the school district offices.

[Cookies.]
Thursday, December 2 from 6:30-8:00pm.

Where: The Nichols School Building 5301 Monona Drive

For interested Community Members, Students, Parents, Staff, Administration and Board Members

Please come for Cookies, Punch, and Information.

We look forward to seeing you!

Tel: 221-7660 ext. 334

e-mail: rebecca.fox-blair@mgschools.net

[Cookies.]

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Land Grant Railroads in Wisconsin, Part II

Addendum: I inexplicably left out the indispensble Law and Locomotives: The Impact of the Railroad in Wisconsin Law in the Nineteenth Century by Robert S. Hunt.

I have also added a photo of Byron Kilbourn's final resting place.


[BEGIN ORIGINAL POST]



I recently posted Land Grant Railroads in Wisconsin, Part 1 that related some background & history of how the US used its vast public landholdings to provide indirect funding for some railroads. A couple of additional note before moving on. The land grant railroads were not as significant as I rather vaguely believed before doing this research. In Wisconsin, as of 1886 land-grant railroad lines constituted only about 20% of total track miles – 973.50 land-grant miles out of 4778 total miles. The total land grant mileage would not have increased in Wisconsin after that date.


The three routes funded by land grants for railroads all served the far northern reaches of the state, the Pinery. The southern part of the state, especially the southeast was already well-served by railroads and had far less need for the US grants. The northern interests strongly believed that the railroad would never reach its environs without the help of the US lands.

The following maps from Illinois suggest that the land grant for the Illinois Central line (from Cairo to Galena with a branch line from Centralia to Chicago) spurred the development of other feeder lines. And they are cool maps anyway.


From Railroads and the Making of America, http://railroads.unl.edu/views/item/landsales_IL?p=5


From Railroads and the Making of America, http://railroads.unl.edu/views/item/landsales_IL?p=5

I ended my prior with the ironic query: what could possibly go wrong?


And as some of you already know, the correct answer was "plenty". The land grants of 1856 led directly to the worst political scandal in the state history. The land grant scandal should be set against the background of how a previous private mode of funding Wisconsin railroads ended in a far greater disaster. 

The Farm Mortgage Debacle

The early 1850's were boom years for Wisconsin wheat farmers (yes, wheat). But the farmers wanted an easier way to get their crops to market than hauling them forty or fifty slow and laborious miles by cart. They wanted railroads to connect them to Chicago or Milwaukee. The railroads of the state were local affairs at the time. Neither the farmers nor the railroads had the capital to build the railroads. State aid was out because the state constitution forbid investment in works of internal improvement. Article VIII, Section 10 provided that "the state may never contract any debt for works of internal improvement, or be a party in carrying on such works." (This proviso has since been amended on several occasions.)

The farm mortgage scheme worked like this: The railroad swapped stock for mortgages on the farms. The farmer mortgaged the farm to pay for the stock. The stock was to yield 10% to the farmer, while the mortgage carried 8% interest. The 'extra' 2% owed to the farmer would be held back by the railroad to pay off the underlying principle. This was all swell, except it amounted to a bunch of poor farmers swapping paper with a bunch of undercapitalized railroads. In order to obtain actual money to build the railroads, the farm mortgages were sold by the railroads (often at a steep discount) to Eastern financial interests.

Local communities also issued local municipal bonds in support of the railroads.

The scheme worked well until the Panic of 1857 plunged the state's railroads into bankruptcy with the state's farmers immediately following (along with many others - see the "sidebar" below).

***

The Wisconsin Historical Society's Odd Wisconsin Archive contains this description of that depression.


The Panic of 1857 was felt especially hard in Wisconsin. LaCrosse, for example, had grown from a hamlet of six houses in 1851 to a town of 6,000 people in 1856 (a fact much touted by the mayor and other promoters). Homes, stores, sawmills, and businesses were sprouting enthusiastically when the Panic hit and employers and investors were unable to get their hands on cash. "Immediately all business operations were paralyzed," wrote a resident afterwards. "Much of the business had been done on credit which depended on outside parties for liquidation. Half a million dollars was owed to the lumbermen from parties down the river, principally. The lumbermen owed the farmers, merchants, banks, mechanics, and laborers, and could not pay."


***

The railroad farm mortgage debacle dominated Wisconsin politics for a decade as farmers and rural interests generally attempted to obtain state legislative relief from their debts. The legislature generally provided relief, but the state Supreme Court consistently overturned these laws.

An excellent source for the history of the railroad farm mortgages is Economic history of Wisconsin during the Civil War decade, by Frederick Merk. Available free on Google Books.



The Land Grant Scandal

The biggest scandal in the history of Wisconsin occurred surrounding the selection of the railroads to build the tracks authorized by the 1856 grants.


Thirteen senators and fifty-nine assemblymen, the Governor, and one Supreme Court Justice were implicated in a bribery scandal.

The excellent article by local attorney Joseph Ranney, Imperia in Imperiis: Law and Railroads in Wisconsin, 1847-1910 describes the scandal:

In 1856 Wisconsin received its first federal railroad land grant from Congress. The federal land grant system provided that when the state selected a railroad to develop a line along a route specified by Congress, that railroad would receive alternate sections of public land in a strip extending six miles along either side of the route. The land would be granted to the railroad in installments as the state certified that successive portions of the road were completed; in the meantime, the railroad could obtain financing on the strength of the grant.


A fierce struggle for the 1856 land grant took place between Byron Kilbourn's La Crosse & Milwaukee Railroad and several competing companies. The La Crosse & Milwaukee won, but shortly afterwards it came out that Kilbourn had engaged in wholesale bribery to win the grant. A special committee of the 1858 Legislature, chaired by Assemblyman James Knowlton of Janesville, discovered that Governor Coles Bashford had received $50,000 worth of La Crosse & Milwaukee stock; supreme court Justice Abram Smith had received $10,000 and other state officials and more than half the members of the 1857 Legislature had received lesser amounts of stock. The 1858 Legislature rescinded the La Crosse & Milwaukee grant and enacted stringent lobbying restrictions and reporting requirements for railroads, but the damage was done. Wisconsin's reputation was damaged throughout the United States, making it more difficult for state railroads to secure outside capital, and it was many years before the state was able to use the 1856 land grant effectively to finance its railroad system.
But as Ranney notes, "Despite the depression, the land grant scandal and the Legislature's failure to adequately control railroad chartering and financing, the demands of a growing economy and the sheer economic advantages of rail transport over rivers and plank roads kept Wisconsin's rail system growing."


You can visit Our Hero at the Forest Home Cemetery in Milwaukee.

Sources and suggested readings:

Many early volumes of the annual (later biennial) reports of the Railroad Commissioners of Wisconsin are available at Google Books, including the very first report of 1874 containing agreta deal of historical data. Tables with data on land grants, municipal railroad bonds, and farm mortgages start at page 401 of the PDF file. According to the report, 3795 farm mortgages were given in the amount of  $4,079,433.

Sanborn, John Bell. Congressional grants of land in aid of railways, Bulletin of the University of Wisconsin, (Economies, Political Science, and History Series, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 263-392.) August 1899.


Ranney, Joseph A. Imperia in Imperiis: Law and Railroads in Wisconsin, 1847-1910, Wisconsin Lawyer Magazine.

Haney, Lewis Henry, A Congressional History of Railways in the United States, 1850-1887, Bulletin of the University of Wisconsin, , (Economies, Political Science, and History Series, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-336.) January 1910. Available free on Google Books.

Bernd, John Muth, The La Crosse and Milwaukee railroad land grant, 1856, Wisconsin Magazine Of History. Volume: 30 /Issue: 2 (1946-1947)

Greiner, Gordon Oswald., Wisconsin national railroad land grants, Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1935.

Economic history of Wisconsin during the Civil War decade, by Frederick Merk. Available free on Google Books.

Links can also be found through the UW's MadCat system.





Monona council report

As previewed yesterday, the Monona city council took up the amendments to Mayor Robb Kahl's proposed 2011 operating budget. After adopting most of the amendments that made more or less minor tweaks, the council adopted the budget by a 6-0 vote.

The entire packet is here: http://www.mymonona.com/pages/calendar/details.php/939/city%2Bcouncil%2Bmeeting/2010-11-15/

To view the proposed 2011 Operating Budget, please click here.




No. 11-01 To increase funding for the senior program expense by $1,908 (from fund balance as I recall, contrary to the wording). Passed 6-0.

No. 11-02 To fund a Transit Study. $11,000. Passed 5-1 (Alder Kugle opposed). No. 11-03 Withdrawn; not needed.

No. 11-04 To decrease Rental Income related to Adams Advertising, i.e., passage could have stopped further consideration of the outdoor advertising sign. This is an advertsing sign in Ahuska Park directed at the Beltline. Total effect of the amendment would have reduced revenue by $ 24,000. Failed 3-3. For the amendment (i.e. oppose the sign): Busse, Wiswell, Munson. Against the amendment (support the sign): Wood, Kugle and Veserat.  

 
The debate on the amendment was muddled by a desire on the part of some members to take a meaningful decision. The decision is far from from final.
 
I support the sign for several reasons: location facing the Beltline, $24,000 annual revenue to the city in each of the next 20 years, and Parks Board support.

No. 11-05 To increase Legislative professional development by $160. Passed 6-0.

No. 11-06 Withdrawn. Tree replacement is funded in capital.


No. 11-07 To reduce the full time recreation assistant to part-time. Perhaps deciding that the eamendment had generated discussion (as he stated) and maybe also deciding that discretion was the better part of valor - or political survival - alder Veserat withdrew the amendment.

  No. 11-08 Alder Veserat's original proposed amendment to increase property taxes by $78,000+ for a new full-time Marketing Director was amended to a $10,000 increase in the the CDA's outside services marketing budget (up to $20,000). Passed as amended 6-0.

No. 11-09 To decrease executive office other by $1,500. To eliminate purchasing of plaques except for one. Alder Veserat withdrew the amendment, which was intended as a bit of levity. Withdrawn.

No. 11-10 My first amendment to add funds for IT. Description: To upgrade our computer software.
1. Adobe Acrobat (8 upgrades and 2 new licenses) $1,300
2. Upgrade our virus software and add malware protection $4000
3. Upgrade our Office Suites from 2003 to 2010 $12,000

Staff has used 2010 funds to acquire the Adobe Acrobat Pro software so that part was withdrawn. As amended passed 6-0.

No. 11-11 My second amendment to add IT funds. To add $8,000 for Web Maintenance. Passed 6-0.

No. 11-12 Withdrawn. Switch already added in 2010.No. 11-13. To add $6459 for part-time wages in the Cable budget. Passed 6-0.

 
Consideration of Ordinance 10-10-620 Consolidating Election Polling Locations Into One Location (City Clerk) (Tabled 11/1/10). Failed.

***

Nonbudget matters:




Approval of Revised Plans for Monona Entry Feature Construction (City Staff) (Tabled 11/1/10). Stayed on the table. It turns out that much of the design proposed by Ken Saiki is not permissible by DOT's rules. (You may assume General Unhappiness with the designer.)

Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1736 Approving the Terms of Contract with the Wisconsin Professional Police Association / Law Enforcement Employee Relations Division (City Administrator). Passed 6-0.


New business
Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1740 Approving the City of Monona’s 25 x 25 Plan for Energy Independence (City Administrator). First reading. Good reading.


Consideration of Ordinance 11-10-621 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances Concerning Signs on City Lands (City Administrator). I have to withdraw my comments about the intent being an end-run around the Plan Commission. The council needs to review and possibly amend the ordinances to allow outdoor advertising signs on the Beltline

Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1741 Approving Municipal Court Hours (Judge Tinker). Passed 6-0.
 

Monday, November 15, 2010

Monona City council Preview - November 15, 2010

Here is the council agenda for tonight's meeting.

CITY COUNCIL


MONONA PUBLIC LIBRARY, COMMUNITY MEDIA ROOM

1000 NICHOLS ROAD

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2010

7:30 P.M.

1. Unfinished Business (Approval Requested Unless Otherwise Noted).

a. Consideration of Ordinance 10-10-620 Consolidating Election Polling Locations Into One Location (City Clerk) (Tabled 11/1/10).

b. Approval of Revised Plans for Monona Entry Feature Construction (City Staff) (Tabled 11/1/10).

c. Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1736 Approving the Terms of Contract with the Wisconsin Professional Police Association / Law Enforcement Employee Relations Division (City Administrator).

d. Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1737 Adopting the 2011 Operating Budget and Establishing a Tax Levy (Mayor Kahl). Amendments: http://www.mymonona.com/pages/calendar/export_file.php?t=1697

2. New Business.

a. Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1740 Approving the City of Monona’s 25 x 25 Plan for Energy Independence (City Administrator).

b. Consideration of Ordinance 11-10-621 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances Concerning Signs on City Lands (City Administrator). This amendment would bypass the Plan Commission for approving signs on city land - it is an attempt to do an end-run to the Plan Commission on the proposed Ahuska Park advertising sign. Those comments were incorrect and withdrawn by me.

c. Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1741 Approving Municipal Court Hours (Judge Tinker).

Opposition to the Proposed Advertising Sign

Mayor and aldermen:




The new Monona Drive looks great--the extra money spent to bury utilities and provide upgraded landscaping was well worth it. I also support the effort to improve the sail feature--these aesthetic improvements are well worth their expense and will make driving around town an enjoyable experience, as well as make our city attractive to potential residents and investors.



They also act to extend the beauty of our surroundings into our city. Considering that most people access Monona from the beltline, we're lucky that our part of the beltline is so scenic. It is among the more scenic highways I've seen. This scenery is enhanced by a lack of billboards. The next time you are traveling east on the Beltline, pay attention to how you feel as you approach the bridge at about John Nolen Drive, which is just where you leave the advertising bombardment that is the Town of Madison's portion of the beltline. If the traffic is flowing, and you're like me, you'll feel slightly calmer on Monona's section as the billboards go away and the scenery opens up.



Installing a large, lit digital billboard at Ahuska is definitely going to ruin this feeling our Beltline has now. I know it may sound silly to some to talk about a busy highway like the Beltline like this--most of us associate this road with bad traffic. But a lot of us drive this road everyday--why not strive to make it as nice as possible?



A billboard here is bad enough, but a lit variable message sign as proposed is even worse. There is a similar sign on I-94 between here and Milwaukee—experienced at night, its bright changing colors seem to reach out for a mile and it is quite jarring. It really disrupts any calm feelings you may have as you drive through the country here. I've really grown to resent it.



While the leasing of land at Ahuska Park for the placement of this sign along the Beltline is certainly a creative revenue generator, I do not see the income gained from this worth the drawbacks. For all the value we've placed on improving the way things look in our community, please do not take a giant step backwards by granting a variance for this sign in our community. Better yet, please don't allow the construction of any more billboards along the Beltline, but certainly not a variable message board.



Respectfully submitted,



Ben Redding

6019 Queens Way

Saturday, November 13, 2010

RTA Meets in Monona This Week

DANE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RTA)


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

5:00 p.m.


Monona Library, Media Room (1st Floor)

1000 Nichols Road
Monona, WI


AGENDA

1. CALL TO ORDER



2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 27, 2010 RTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING





3. REPORT FROM STAFF AND BOARD MEMBERS

i. Bylaws, Policies and Contracts Committee Work

ii. Plan for Transit Committee Work

iii. RTA Advisory Committee Update

iv. Report from the RTA Chair





4. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS

i. Update of High Speed Passenger Rail Planning Activities (Wisconsin Department of Transportation)

ii. Overview of Monona Transit and Planning Activities (Scott Munson, Monona Transit Committee Co-Chair)





5. PUBLIC COMMENT (Note: Three Minutes Maximum per Person)







6. DISCUSSION AND ACTION BY RTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

i. Nominations for RTA Advisory Committee


7. ADJOURNMENT

Sunday, November 07, 2010

Land Grant Railroads in Wisconsin, Part 1

Following is an edited version of a presentation I gave recently at the Wisconsin DOT Fall Rail Conference.

In the 19th century, the United States provided huge grants of public lands for a variety of activities, including canals, education (both elementary and college), homesteads, wagon roads, plank roads & Macadamized roads - and railroads.

Uncle Sam: Land Baron

At the end of the Revolutionary War, the British ceded lands to the United States, including the 260,000 square miles that became the Northwest Territory, which included the area that became the State of Wisconsin in 1848.



The US also acquired:


1803 – Louisiana Purchase 829,000 sq. miles

1818 – British Cession 46,000 sq. miles

1819 – Florida Cessions 59,000 sq. miles

1845 – Texas Annexation 390,000 sq. miles

1846 – Oregon Territory 286,000 sq. miles

1848 – Mexican Cession 525,000 sq. miles

1853 – Gadsden Purchase 30,000 sq. miles



The United States had added about 2,425,000 square miles to its territory and owned nearly all of it. Thus, by the time of the first railroad land grant in 1850, the US owned a vast amount of land.

1850 – Land grant for the Illinois Central began the railroad land grant era and set the model for future legislation.


The grant was hugely successful as detailed by the University of Nebraska at Lincoln's website Railroads and the Making of America (where you can find a rich collection of photos, land contracts, maps, animations, and analysis): 


The transformation of Illinois was nothing less than explosive in these years. The Illinois Central advertised intensely and attracted settlers from England, Canada, Vermont, Germany, and Ireland. Large numbers came from Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, and New England. The town of West Urbana in Champaign County provided a useful example: it was a depot in 1854, then in two years it had 1,500 people and farm prices had increased 100 per cent. The county also grew between 1850 and 1860: improved acreage jumped from 23,000 to 170,000 acres, and the value of farm property skyrocketed from $478,000 to $5,178,800. Carbondale, another Illinois Central depot town, stood as a lonely, recently surveyed railroad stop in 1852, but in five years the place attracted over 1,200 residents. Cairo too increased its population in the 1850s, by a remarkable ten times.

Paul Gates suggested that 34,000 sales were made by the Illinois Central from 1854-1870 and these sales brought 100,000 new residents to the state (Paul Wallace Gates, The Illinois Central and Its Colonization Work, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934, p. 250).
1856 – Congress approves land grants for railroad development in eight states, including Wisconsin.

1860’s – Congress approved land grants for 4 of 5 transcontinental routes.

Congress gave land grants to the states to aid the construction of rail lines for specific routes that included six square miles of land for each mile of track built (later grants increased to 10 sq. miles). Wisconsin used public land grants to build three main rail routes.

1880 US General Land Office map showing land grants for railroads, wagon roads, and canals. http://www.davidrumsey.com/

Congress also provided “indemnity lands”, which were replacement lands to compensate for any lands in the main grant that had already been sold and thus withdrawn from the public domain. “Indemnity lands” were the nearest vacant public lands outside of the main grant and not more than 15 miles from the right-of-way (later increased to 20 miles).

From Railroads and the Making of America, http://railroads.unl.edu/views/item/landsales_IL?p=5

1886 General Land Office map showing grants for railroads and wagon roads. http://www.davidrumsey.com/

  The land was provided in a checkerboard pattern of alternating township sections. Odd-numbered sections went to the railroad. Even-numbered sections were retained by the US for sale to private parties.

Map showing a Township section map. Shaded sections were granted to the railroad.


How much land? As of 1886, some 155,000,000 (155 million) acres were granted and 49,650,000 acres were patented to the various states for transfer to the railroads. In Wisconsin, some 2,874,000 acres was certified or patented – about 7% of all lands. For reference, Wisconsin covers 65,498 square miles or 41,918,720 acres.

How much trackage? As of 1886, some 17,724 miles of land-grant railroad tracks had been constructed in 26 states. In Wisconsin, land-grant railroad lines constituted about 20% of total track miles – 973.50 land-grant miles out of 4778 total miles.

How did it work? Congress specified the route and made a grant of public lands to a state. The state legislature then selected the railroad. This selection process was ripe for corruption, as we shall see.

The railroad then filed a map of definite location with the General Land Office of the Department of Interior. The route could be altered so long as the map filed encompassed the actual route as determined by the Department of the Interior. See, Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. Co. (Bayfield Branch), 6 Pub. Lands Dec. 209, 1887 WL 561 (D.O.I.)

As soon as the railroad filed its map of the route, the Department of Interior removed all of the land from the public domain, including the indemnity lands. The land grants withdrew 30-mile-wide swaths of public lands from the public domain (later 40-mile-wide. Settlers were then barred from buying lands on the odd-numbered sections located within the main grant and the indemnity lands.

This policy was a source of bitter friction between the railroads and homesteaders, especially when combined with DOI decisions allowing the railroad to alter its route. These corridors of land were removed from public sale while the railroad made its selection of indemnity lands.

How did the land grants help the railroad? As the railroad completed 20-mile sections, the state would certify the completion and the US would release the lands to the railroad. How did railroads use the land?

  • Free land to build the railroad.


  • Provided collateral for bonds (the railroads did not always wait until they had a patent).

  • Revenue from selling most of the lands.

  • Harvested timber and quarried rock for the railroad construction.

  • Sold stumpage rights.
The Wisconsin Central Railroad Company (WCRC) received about 884,000 acres under the 1864 grant for a railroad running from the center of the state to Lake Superior. By 1890, the WCRC had sold 268,194 acres for $765,041 and had received $962,960 for stumpage.

Three main land-grant railroad routes were built in Wisconsin under grants of land passed by Congress in 1856 and 1864. The 1856 law provided for a northwest route and northeast route. The 1864 law provided for the central route.

The 1856 act passed by Congress described the routes :


“from Madison, or Columbus, by the way of Portage City to the St. Croix River or Lake between townships twenty-five and thirty-one and from thence to the west end of Lake Superior; and to Bayfield”;


“and also from Fond du Lac on Lake Winnebago, northerly to the State line…”.

1856 Land Grant Act, Statutes at Large, XI, 20 [Ch. 43, 11 Stat. 20 (June 3, 1856)]

Both routes were later altered by Congress. The Northwest Route was amended to require that run through both Madison and Columbus. The Northeast Route was also altered to run along Green Bay.


Map from unpublished master's thesis by Greiner, Gordon Oswald., Wisconsin national railroad land grants, Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1935.

The 1864 Land Grant Act renewed and extended the time to complete 1856 grants and authorized a third route running from the central portion of the state to Lake Superior.

“From Portage City, Berlin, Doty's Island or Fon [sic] du Lac, as said state may determine, in a northwestern direction to Bayfield, and thence to Superior, on Lake Superior.”

1864 Land Grant Act, Statutes at Large, XIII, 66. [Ch. 80, 13 Stat. 66 (May 5, 1864)]

What could possibly go wrong? To be continued.

Thursday, November 04, 2010

Green Tuesdays Films & Lectures

See the films Flow and UW student short Holy Land, WI

When: Tue, November 9, 6:30pm – 8:00pm
Where: Monona Public Library, 1000 Nichols Road, Monona, WI

Flow is Irena Salina’s award-winning documentary investigation into what experts label the most important political and environmental issue of the 21st Century – the world water crisis.

“An astonishingly wide-ranging film. An informed and heartfelt examination of the tug of war between public health and private interests.” – New York Times

“Lively and engaging…Smartly Done” – Los Angeles Times

Plus, student short Holy Land, WI. Some of Wisconsin’s most sacred land – fifteen effigy mounds – is under a farmer Frank’s feet. What will happen to the land when Frank is not here to protect it?

If you miss it in Monona, you can see it in four other communities. Check out the full calendar here.

About Green Tuesdays

A free series of films, presentations, and conversations on sustainability, Green Tuesdays in Monona are on the second and fifth Tuesdays of the month, from September through May. All are welcome. Whole Foods serves treats, so attendees are encouraged to come early for delightful food and drink.

Green Tuesdays, a project of The Natural Step Monona and the Monona Public Library, now reaches four additional communities: Mt. Horeb, Middleton, Cross Plains, and Oregon. To see the calendar for all Green Tuesday and Thursday dates, go to www.tnsmonona.org/green-tuesdays-green-thursdays.

Green Tuesdays is sponsored by The Natural Step Monona in collaboration with Oregon Working to Live Sustainably (OWLS), Mount Horeb Area Sustainability Network, RGPL Green Tuesdays (Cross Plains), the City of Middleton Sustainability Committee, Cottage Grove Green Tuesdays, and the Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, and is supported by the Dane County Environmental Council.

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

Monona Council - Quick report

The Monona city council deferred action on all but one item last night. The council approved the Capital Transfer Request for 2011 Maywood Park Trail (Park & Recreation Board).


The Resolution Adopting the 2011 Operating Budget and Establishing a Tax Levy was on for a first reading. The council went through the twelve amendments, but no votes were taken. This is all consistent with our standard procedure. No action was taken on any of the amendments. The council will vote on the amendments and the budget at its November 15 meeting.

Eight residents spoke or registered all in opposition to Alder Veserat's proposal to cut a half-time position from the park & rec/community center/outdoor pool budgets. In addition, the council has received a significant number of emails on the topic, again all opposed to the proposed cut. My sense was that the amendment does not have much support on the council, but perhaps alders were just keeping their powder dry as once advised by that great parliamentarian Oliver Cromwell.

Two items of unfinished business were not ready for decision (Consolidating Election Polling Locations Into One Location and Approval of Revised Plans for Monona Entry Feature Construction).


The remaining two items were on the agenda for a first reading only. 

Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1736 Approving the Terms of Contract with the Wisconsin Professional Police Association / Law Enforcement Employee Relations Division (City Administrator).


Consideration of Resolution 10-11-1739 Capital Transfer Request for 2010 Pool Shower/ Locker Room Floor Project (Park & Recreation Board).
 
 

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Monona Budget Amendments for 2011 - Doing a Double-Take


Now that the Monona city council has completed its initial work review sessions of Mayor Kahl's budget, we alders get to weigh in with twelve amendments.

ADDENDUM: Maybe I should mention when the council will meet again, eh?

The council takes up the budget this coming Monday, November 1, 2010 at 7:30 PM at the media room in the Monona Public Library.

And I forgot to mention that there is always an Appearance section at the beginnning of the city council meeting and Monday's agenda includes a Public Hearing To Receive Public Input Regarding the Proposed 2011 Operating Budget and Tax Levy.

[END OF ADDENDUM]




The entire budget is also on the city council web page.  


A ho-hum budget got a bit more interesting with a couple of amendments offered by alder Mike Veserat. All told (tolled?) the amendments would add $102,768.00 to the property tax levy for 2011. Most of that increase would come from a $78,000 increase due to alder Veserat's proposal to add a full-time Marketing Director. That one came out of the deep left-field - on the warning track - but hooking foul and out of play. Well, it's a new idea so let's hear what he has to say, but.... 





But Veserat's amendment that has created a buzz - as in a large herd of buzzing Africanized killer bees - is his proposal to cut a half-time position from the Mayor's proposed Parks/Recreation/Community Center/Outdoor Pool budget. To be fair, the Mayor proposed to increase an existing half-time assistant to full-time. Veserat is proposing to go back to the status quo in budget-terms. I oppose this amendment. Adding resources to his budget partly a reward for excellent performance by Park & Rec Director Jake Anderson and his staff. It is also a recognition of the demand for these services. We have discovered that if you offer good and varied rec programs and services, people will come in droves. 


And really, if you want to deal with angry parents, especially of young children, run for school board!








If both of these amendments go down, will alder Mike be in danger of becoming known as Warning Track Mike (i.e. he has "warning track power"). (Just having some fun, folks, don't get your skivvies in a knot. Go here to read about the puzzling origin of the term skivvies and here to learn why you should not tie a knot in your skivvies while wearing them - scroll to the comments.)





I offered three amendments totaling $28,300 for IT improvements (including new and upgraded software, website contract services). I propose to use fund balance reserve to pay for these items. That use would leave the city with a healthy 19% reserve.


Here is a summary of the proposed budget.


Monona City Council Budget Meeting 
Monday, November 1, 2010 at 7:30 PM 
Community Media Room in the Monona Public Library



 Public Hearing To Receive Public Input
Regarding the Proposed 2011 Operating Budget and Tax Levy

And leave your bees at home.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

What Grows There?

Or I should say, what grew here? The lone prairie. Found this on the great UW professor of history William Cronon's website. Also go to this page and scroll down to a series of aerial photos of Madison's southwest side.


Click on the map for a larger version


Wednesday, October 27, 2010

More Bayfield Photos

Some photos I took in September 2010 in Bayfield, Wisconsin. The full set is on Photobucket.

Basswood Island


Madeline Island Ferry depot in Bayfield



Ferry headed to Madeline Island

Bayfield harbor sculpture
Bayfield harbor walk

Bayfield marina

The Madeline at rest
Madeline Island from Bayfield
Looking across STH 13

New Bike Path Over the Beltline

Great news for area bikers. According to madison.com, a new bike path will extend across the Beltline and eventually connect with the Military ridge Trail.

"In Dane County, about $2.5 million will help cover costs of a 4-mile Cannonball Path, which will cross the Beltline on Madison's South Side and run on an abandoned Union Pacific rail bed through Fitchburg to the Military Ridge Trail."

This trail provides a much needed additional safe route across the Beltline for bikers.



Some Bayfield Photos

Here is a sampling of photographs I took this past April 2010 in Bayfield, Wisconsin and envrions.

Sea Caves at Big Bay State Park on Madeline Island


Big Bay State Park


Bayfield from the Madeline Island Ferry
Madeline Island from the golf course above Bayfield
Madeline Island from the golf course above Bayfield


Long Island

Maggie's

Iron Bridge

Bayfield Carnegie Public Library

National Lakeshore HQ

On the Iron Bridge
View from the Iron Bridge
Wrought Iron Fence at the Rice House
Rice House
Grace Episcopal
April 25, 2010